Well, I’ve just gotten home (pretty much literally), and am I tired! Three very long days (the training only went from 9-5) but there was an awful lot of knowledge rammed into my skull during that time. The course itself was quite “dry”, in that it’s all very management-y and best practice sort of stuff. A bit hard to explain, since the whole thing was so broad.
Although we’d done two practice exams, I was still worried going into the real exam, and I suppose I should have been. Still, the pass requirement is 26/40 questions correct. This means that you can pretty much miss every one in four questions (25%!) and pass! Hopefully that will give me some comfort (for the record, my practice exam scores were 30/40 and 32/40). I (and all the other course attendees) will not know the results for a couple of weeks, since they have to be sent to the UK for grading. Hopefully (if the new blog hasn’t been run out of town) I will post the results here as soon as I know (well, if I fail it will probably be a very short post ;).
Although I was initially booked into a motel, Chris (one of the guys from the course — who also works as Deakin Burwood, incidentally) offered to let me stay at his girlfriend’s parent’s beach house (nice, close relationship to the owners there). Glenn, my boss, was happy about the arrangement as he got out of the motel fees. Anyway, it made the whole thing a little more interesting since I had a “study buddy” (such a crap term). Least we managed to belt out a few hours of Xbox games last night to clear our minds from all the study, study, study.
Speaking of study, if you’re interested in what the course is actually about, it’s basically best practices for pretty much all IT stuff. Best practice for disaster recovery (actually it’s more than that), new releases (of software, or hardware), for instance, helpdesk management and other things like service level agreements. A broad bunch of stuff.
That’s really all I have to say at the moment; tired, going to have a boring Friday night, I think.
Oh, if you’re wondering about the title, it’s from my year 10 Business Management class. The definition ends “… of the cost of a non-current asset, over it’s expected useful life.” It was drilled into our heads enough I’ll probably remember it when I’m 70.
No comments,
make a comment »